logo
menu_icon
close_icon
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Blog
  • Contribution
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE
logo
Menu icon
Close icon
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Blog
  • Contribution
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE

Requiring Already Licensed Attorneys To Reinvent the Wheel and Take A Second Bar Exam to Obtain General Admission in a Federal District Court or Another State Supreme Court Violates Federal Licensing Standards

  • Uncategorized
    |
    August 14, 2023

    Requiring Already Licensed Attorneys To Reinvent the Wheel and Take A Second Bar Exam to Obtain General Admission in a Federal District Court or Another State Supreme Court Violates Federal Licensing Standards

    Access to justice is a public good. The denial of a public good injures the public. Almost 63,000 lawyers were admitted to the bar of a second state by admission on motion1 or UBE transfer2 between
    Continue Reading
  • Uncategorized
    |
    December 9, 2022

    Delaware Supreme Court Residence & Clerkship For Admission to Delaware District Court Is Unlawful Based on Third Circuit and Supreme Court Precedent.

    Click here to view full article. LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION hereby requests leave of the Court to file a Supplemental Memorandum Opposing Dismissal, which it submits is necessary because
    Continue Reading
  • Uncategorized
    |
    October 3, 2022

    Federal chart of pro se appeals

    Twenty-seven percent of all civil cases filed in the United States District Court had at least one pro se party.[1]  The following chart depicts the numbers of total appeals and the shocking
    Continue Reading
  • Uncategorized
    |
    September 15, 2022

    Nonuniform Local Rules that Deny General Admission Privileges to Lawyers Licensed

    RECENT SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT PROVES THE CHALLENGED NONUNIFORM LOCAL RULES THAT DENY GENERAL ADMISSION PRIVILEGES TO LAWYERS LICENSED IN 49 STATES ARE UNLAWFUL          The facts and Supreme
    Continue Reading

Recent Posts

  • Requiring Already Licensed Attorneys To Reinvent the Wheel and Take A Second Bar Exam to Obtain General Admission in a Federal District Court or Another State Supreme Court Violates Federal Licensing Standards
  • Delaware Supreme Court Residence & Clerkship For Admission to Delaware District Court Is Unlawful Based on Third Circuit and Supreme Court Precedent.
  • Federal chart of pro se appeals
  • Nonuniform Local Rules that Deny General Admission Privileges to Lawyers Licensed

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Newsletters

Subscribe to our newsletters and stay updated!

contact us

office location:

12016 WILSHIRE BLVD
STE 5
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Email:
holmes@lawyers-inc.com
Quick Links
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy


Connect with us
Map and Directions

© 2022 Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission Utah Web Design

law_logo