logo
menu_icon
close_icon
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Blog
  • Contribution
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE
logo
Menu icon
Close icon
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Blog
  • Contribution
  • Federal Litigation
  • State Admission on Motion and Tit-for-Tat Admission
  • The Cal Bar Exam for Already Licensed Attorneys Is Not a Valid and Reliable Test
  • UBE

Lawyers for Fair Reciprocal Admission files Request to Take Judicial Notice of Legal Memorandum Reviewing 20 Supreme Court Attorney First Amendment Decisions Showing Strict Scrutiny is the Standard or Review. Hearing set for June 6 by District Judge.

Click here to download.

Recent Posts

  • Requiring Already Licensed Attorneys To Reinvent the Wheel and Take A Second Bar Exam to Obtain General Admission in a Federal District Court or Another State Supreme Court Violates Federal Licensing Standards
  • Delaware Supreme Court Residence & Clerkship For Admission to Delaware District Court Is Unlawful Based on Third Circuit and Supreme Court Precedent.
  • Federal chart of pro se appeals
  • Nonuniform Local Rules that Deny General Admission Privileges to Lawyers Licensed

Categories

  • Uncategorized

Newsletters

Subscribe to our newsletters and stay updated!

contact us

office location:

12016 WILSHIRE BLVD
STE 5
LOS ANGELES, CA 90025

Email:
holmes@lawyers-inc.com
Quick Links
  • Sitemap
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Privacy Policy


Connect with us
Map and Directions

© 2022 Lawyers For Fair Reciprocal Admission Utah Web Design

law_logo